Defending American Companies and Innovators From Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties
Record date: 2025-02-26
Memorandum of February 21, 2025 Defending American Companies and Innovators From Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties Memorandum for the Secretary of the Treasury[,] the Secretary of Commerce[,] the United States Trade Representative[, and] the Senior Counselor to the President for Trade and Manufacturing Section 1 . Purpose. In recent years, the gross domestic product of the United States' digital economy alone, driven by cutting-edge American technology companies, has been bigger than the entire economy of Australia, Canada, or most members of the European Union. Instead of empowering their
What this record contains
- Federal Register document
- 2025-03188
- Publication date
- 2025-02-26
- Citation
- 90 FR 10685
- Issuing office
- Executive Office of the President
Official record excerpt
Memorandum of February 21, 2025 Defending American Companies and Innovators From Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties Memorandum for the Secretary of the Treasury[,] the Secretary of Commerce[,] the United States Trade Representative[, and] the Senior Counselor to the President for Trade and Manufacturing Section 1 . Purpose. In recent years, the gross domestic product of the United States' digital economy alone, driven by cutting-edge American technology companies, has been bigger than the entire economy of Australia, Canada, or most members of the European Union. Instead of empowering their own workers and economies, foreign governments have increasingly exerted extraterritorial authority over American companies, particularly in the technology sector, hindering these companies' success and appropriating revenues that should contribute to our Nation's well-being, not theirs. Beginning in 2019, several trading partners enacted digital services taxes (DSTs) that could cost American companies billions of dollars and that foreign government officials openly admit are designed to plunder American companies. Foreign countries have additionally adopted regulations governing digital services that are more burdensome and restrictive on United States companies than their own domestic companies. Additional foreign legal regimes limit cross-border data flows, require American streaming services to fund local productions, and charge network usage and Internet termination fees. All of these measures violate American sovereignty and offshore American jobs, limit American companies' global competitiveness, and increase American operational costs while exposing our sensitive information to potentially hostile foreign regulators. My Administration will not allow American companies and workers and American economic and national security interests to be compromised by one-sided, anti-competitive policies and practices of foreign governments. American businesses will no longer prop up failed foreign economies through extortive fines and taxes. Sec. 2 . Policy. It is the policy of my Administration that where a foreign government, through its tax or regulatory structure, imposes a fine, penalty, tax, or other burden that is discriminatory, disproportionate, or designed to transfer significant funds or intellectual property from American companies to the foreign government or the foreign government's favored domestic entities, my Administration will act, imposing tariffs and taking such other responsive actions necessary to mitigate the harm to the United States and to repair any resulting imbalance. In taking such responsive action, my Administration shall consider: (a) taxes imposed on United States companies by foreign governments, including those that may discriminate against United States companies; (b) regulations imposed on United States companies by foreign governments that could inhibit the growth or intended operation of United States companies; (c) any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that could require a United States company to jeopardize its intellectual property; and (d) Any other act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that serves to undermine the global competitiveness of United States companies. ( printed page 10686) Sec. 3 . Agency Responsibilities. (a) The United States Trade Representative shall determine, in accordance with applicable law, whether to renew investigations under section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2411 ) of the DSTs of France, Austria, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and the United Kingdom, which were initiated under my Administration on July 16, 2019, and June 5, 2020. If the United States Trade Representative determines to renew such investigations, he shall take all appropriate and feasible action in response to those DSTs. (b) The United States Trade Representative shall determine, consistent with section 302(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 ( 19 U.S.C. 2412(b) ) (section 302(b)), whether to investigate the DST of any other country that may discriminate against United States companies or burden or restrict United States commerce. He shall further determine whether to pursue a panel under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on the DST imposed by Canada and whether to investigate Canada's DST under section 302(b). In making these determinations, the United States Trade Representative shall consult with the Secretary of the Treasury, as appropriate. (c) The Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative shall jointly identify trade and other regulatory practices by other countries, including, without limitation, those described in section 2 of this memorandum, that discriminate against, disproportionately affect, or otherwise undermine the global competitiveness or intended operation of United States
The excerpt is reproduced from the public federal record and may omit later sections, tables, signatures or attachments. Open the official source for the complete text.
Questions for accountability
- What legal authority does this economy action cite?
- Which agencies or officials were directed to act?
- What measurable implementation, cost, deadline or later court action followed?
How to use this page
This is a source-record entry, not a truth-rating by itself. It preserves the action, date and original government publication so it can be connected to later claims, implementation records, court decisions, costs and measurable outcomes. Editorial claim reviews on this site use separate finding labels and explain the evidence for those findings.