Restoring American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific
Record date: 2026-06-17
( printed page 36741) Proclamation 11035 of June 11, 2026 Restoring American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific A Proclamation Building on prior actions to strengthen American seafood production and support working fishing communities, this proclamation restores access to hundreds of thousands of square miles of Pacific waters for commercial fishing managed under existing Federal law. I have determined that restoring access to responsibly managed fishing grounds will promote economic opportunity while ensuring continued stewardship of our Nation's marine resources. On June 15, 2006, pursuant to the Antiquities Act ( 54
What this record contains
- Federal Register document
- 2026-12283
- Publication date
- 2026-06-17
- Citation
- 91 FR 36741
- Issuing office
- Executive Office of the President
Official record excerpt
( printed page 36741) Proclamation 11035 of June 11, 2026 Restoring American Commercial Fishing in the Pacific A Proclamation Building on prior actions to strengthen American seafood production and support working fishing communities, this proclamation restores access to hundreds of thousands of square miles of Pacific waters for commercial fishing managed under existing Federal law. I have determined that restoring access to responsibly managed fishing grounds will promote economic opportunity while ensuring continued stewardship of our Nation's marine resources. On June 15, 2006, pursuant to the Antiquities Act ( 54 U.S.C. 320301 ), President Bush issued Proclamation 8031 establishing the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Marine National Monument, later renamed the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. On August 26, 2016, President Obama issued Proclamation 9478 expanding that monument. On January 6, 2009, pursuant to the Antiquities Act, President Bush issued Proclamation 8335 establishing the Mariana Trench Marine National Monument and Proclamation 8337 establishing the Rose Atoll Marine National Monument. These proclamations imposed restrictions on commercial fishing within specified areas of the monuments. Prior to the establishment of these monuments, the marine resources identified in Proclamations 8031, 8335, 8337, and 9478 were subject to comprehensive Federal management and conservation authorities, including regulations that managed commercial fishing. After further consideration of the nature of the objects identified in Proclamations 8031, 8335, 8337, and 9478 and the protection of those objects already provided by Federal law, I find that appropriately managed commercial fishing under existing statutory authorities will not put the historic and scientific objects within these areas at risk. The marine resources identified in Proclamations 8031, 8335, 8337, and 9478 are subject to comprehensive Federal management and conservation authorities. For example, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. ) (Magnuson-Stevens) establishes regional fishery management councils, supervised by the Secretary of Commerce in coordination with the States and affected stakeholders, that develop fishery management plans to regulate our Nation's fisheries, using the best available science and observing strict conservation and management requirements. Magnuson-Stevens requires a similar process of scientific fisheries management for highly migratory species and provides that fishery management plans may include, among other measures, management measures to conserve target and non-target species and habitats. The monuments at issue in this proclamation fall within the oversight of the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), which has developed several comprehensive Fishery Ecosystem Plans that enable sustainable fishing while affording protections tailored to the variety of sensitive ecosystems and marine life which the Council oversees. The Council regularly monitors its fisheries and adapts its plans to afford ongoing protection responsive to the most recent science and ocean conditions. ( printed page 36742) Additional protections are provided under the following statutes, several of which are effectuated directly through the applicable fishery management plans: the Endangered Species Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), the Marine Mammal Protection Act ( 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. ), the Oil Pollution Act ( 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. ), the Clean Water Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ), Title I of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1401 et seq. ), the National Historic Preservation Act ( 54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq. ), the Migratory Bird Treaty Act ( 16 U.S.C. 703-712 ), and the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act ( 16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq. ). These statutes provide sufficient enforceable mechanisms to properly manage the monument objects addressed in this proclamation. For example, the Endangered Species Act generally prohibits the taking of fish and wildlife species listed as endangered, and also generally ensures that Federal actions, including fisheries management, are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any listed species. The Marine Mammal Protection Act provides protections for marine mammals, and prohibits their taking, subject to some exceptions. Therefore, I find that certain monument-based prohibitions on commercial fishing are not necessary at this time for the proper care and management of the monuments or the objects of historic or scientific interest therein. Proclamation 10918 previously modified the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument by providing, among other things, that the Secretary of Commerce shall not prohibit commercial fishing within specified Monument and Monument Expansion
The excerpt is reproduced from the public federal record and may omit later sections, tables, signatures or attachments. Open the official source for the complete text.
Questions for accountability
- What legal authority does this economy action cite?
- Which agencies or officials were directed to act?
- What measurable implementation, cost, deadline or later court action followed?
How to use this page
This is a source-record entry, not a truth-rating by itself. It preserves the action, date and original government publication so it can be connected to later claims, implementation records, court decisions, costs and measurable outcomes. Editorial claim reviews on this site use separate finding labels and explain the evidence for those findings.